Italian thoracic anesthesia: a prospective survey
نویسندگان
چکیده
algorithms and recommendations on different fields. Actually there is not an European ‘Thoracic Anesthesia’ society, and the issues of this subject area are often discussed and managed by national and international Cardiothoracic and Vascular anesthesia societies. This phenomenon can be related to the fact that in most of North American and Anglo-Saxon countries cardiac and thoracic surgery are usually performed by the same surgical and anesthesiology team. Differently in Italy where thoracic surgery can be performed by a non cardio-surgical team or even by general surgeons That is why most thoracic anesthesiologists are not used to manage cardio surgical patients. The creation of European Association of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesiology (EACTA www.eacta.org) and the following creation of Italian Association of CardioThoracic Anesthesia (ITACTA www.itacta. org) led to a relevant diffusion of knowledge between the cardio-anesthesiologists and a creation of a solid network between many of the high volume Italian cardio surgical centers. This was not the case for thoracic anesthesia centers, since, so far, there is no specific ‘thoracic anesthesia’ network’ and the cultural change between the providers is often left to few focused workshops, or time limited spaces included in general or cardio anesthesia congresses. This results in different ways of managing thoracic anesthesia in different hospitals. Sir, anesthesia, as well as other specialties, is characterized by constant progresses in knowledge and by the introduction of more sophisticated devices. One of the way chosen by scientific community to keep anesthesiologists up to date is the creation of national and international societies. Their mission is to share the recent literature, organize meetings regarding specific topics of anesthesia, and, in general, to promote a continuous feedback between members in relation to the current practice in different centers. Anesthesia Societies have a relevant role in scientific and academic activities since the organization of multicentre studies and meetings leads to an improvement of knowledge in a large part of the anesthesia and intensive care communities. Moreover, they hold an important role in clinical practice, since a continuous headto-head between healthcare providers is a good and efficacious way to increase the standard level of care in many of the medical specialties. Guidelines can be considered the main and most useful “product” of the Anesthesia societies since they represent the results of scientific and clinical issues in defining
منابع مشابه
Non-intubated thoracoscopic surgery for decortication of empyema under thoracic epidural anesthesia: a case report
General anesthesia is the main strategy for almost all thoracic surgeries. However, a growing body of literature has reported successful cases of non-intubated thoracic surgery with regional anesthesia. This alternative strategy not only prevents complications related to general anesthesia, such as lung injury, incomplete re-expansion and intubation related problems, but also accords with trend...
متن کاملA Survey of Blood Request Versus Blood Utilization at a University Hospital in Iran
Background: Reservation of blood leads to blood wastage if the blood is not transfused. Therefore, in some centers only blood type and screen are evaluated. In this study, the efficacy of a blood crossmatch-to-transfusion ratio was measured and then compared with the standard levels. Methods: This prospective study was conducted during one year in a university hospital. During this period, 39...
متن کاملOriginal Contribution COMPARISON OF THE USE OF THORACIC EPIDURAL ANALGESIA IN AWAKE PATIENTS VERSUS GENERAL ANESTHESIA UNDERGOING INTRA-ABDOMINAL SURGERY
PURPOSE: Our goal was to compare the efficacy and side effects of thoracic epidural anesthesia or general anaesthesia during intra-abdominal surgery. METHODS: A hundred twenty-five patients were randomized to receive thoracic epidural anesthesia in awake patients (Group TEA) or general anesthesia (Group GA) in a prospective, randomized study. Preoperatively, all patients received a thoracic epi...
متن کاملComparative Evaluation of Continuous Thoracic Paravertebral Block and Thoracic Epidural Analgesia Techniques for Post-operative Pain Relief in Patients Undergoing Open Nephrectomy: A Prospective, Randomized, Single-blind Study
BACKGROUND Open surgical procedures are associated with substantial postoperative pain; an alternative method providing adequate pain relief with minimal side effects is very much required. AIM The aim of this study was a comparative evaluation of the efficacy of continuous thoracic paravertebral block (PVB) and thoracic epidural analgesia (EA) for postoperative pain relief in patients underg...
متن کاملمقایسه بیهوشی عمومی و بیحسی اپیدورال توراسیک در توراکوسکوپی تشخیصی قفسه سینه
Background & Aims: Better clinical outcomes are observed in patients who undergo thoracic procedures under thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA). This study aimed to compare the outcome of diagnostic thoracoscopy between patients with General anaesthesia (GA) and TEA. Materials & Methods: In this randomized prospective study 30 candidates of diagnostic thoracoscopy underwent either GA (n=15) or...
متن کامل